Is The Tinder Rebrand Really A Success? Not Everyone Is So Sure…
Source: Creative Bloq, Georgia Coggan
Photo: Tinder/Porto Rocha
Tinder has rebranded for the first time in a decade, with many commentators (us included) calling it a clever move that seeks to bring authenticity back to the original dating platform. The concept is built around a fictional dating columnist called T (who has a hint of the Carrie Bradshaw), has bold new typography and a new look for its multi-media imagery.
But while the identity has all the components of a successful rebrand, do the parts really all come together to create the right vibe for Gen Z’s hunt for real connection? Some experts (and other users simply commenting across the internet) aren’t so sure.
Jade Horton, Strategy Partner at Elmwood Brand Consultants is one branding expert who has some reservations. Read her thoughts below, and let us know what you think in the comments!
“Everyone’s calling Tinder’s rebrand a masterclass in ‘brand perspective.’ It’s good. But I think we’re clapping a bit early. The design is smarter – bold flame, more confident type, and a positive shift from that sweet old pink to a grown-up red. And “T”, the fictional dating columnist who sounds like she’s actually lived it rather than studied it, is a clever idea.
Here’s my hesitation. A point of view isn’t something you narrate; it’s something you live. “T” tells us Tinder gets modern dating. The stronger move is to build an experience that proves it, so you don’t need a character to say it out loud. Because brands get judged on the gap between what they say and what they do. And there’s a gap.
“The identity talks warmly about honesty and connection, while the product’s getting ready to let AI scan your camera roll to rate your “chemistry”. Now, this generation will share their data freely, around 88% hand data to social platforms happily. But they’re also the most suspicious of it: 72% distrust AI security (the highest of any age group, according to Forbes), and only 39% trust brands with their data at all.